illinoiscarry.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=19429 www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/04/florida-lawmakers-approve-warning-shot-bill-revising-self-defense-laws/ Some time ago, I was ridiculed for saying that a magazine (clip is what I said) would be enough and that you would no longer have magazines with you. However, everyone here is talking about 2 shots or less. This gun tip video explains to viewers the importance of knowing what`s near and behind your target before shooting. If you fired a warning shot, Toby says you`d have no idea where that bullet might land. It has the potential to kill an innocent person. The funny thing is that the “warning shot” bill does not allow warning shots. Andrew Branca has a good summary of the law, which can be found here, HOWEVER. I fear for them (and for the rest of us) that this may lead prosecutors to expect a warning shot. I could only see them say to the jury, “He could have fired a warning shot! Instead, he shot the “victim” twice in the chest! No legal authority to fire “warning shots” – in fact, legal language would deny the justification for any “warning shot” that “poses a threat to public safety,” which seems to apply to all but the rarest circumstances. The bottom line is that we are responsible for every turn we let out of our barrel. Warning shots are just bad mojo. Headlines: Illinois police fired warning shots at the heads of the rioters today.
Unfortunately, they killed six family members who were watching from a balcony. How can they tell what is the warning shot of two or more shots? I don`t know. Maybe the warning shots should be brought in civilian court if they can`t prove that they actually wanted to kill someone, like reckless endangerment + a lawsuit or something like that. They are stupid people, in my opinion, but more than 20 years seems crazy to me, if I use something else, it could have been (relatively) good. I believe the intent of this legislation is to prevent people from going to jail for firing a warning shot. I don`t know if it`s still in the books, but the IL law allows LEOs to shoot warning shots, and the only agency that has yet come out in favor of its use has been the ISP. The witnesses are incredibly unreliable, but you have 2 use cases, everyone heard 2 shots. This video on the use of defensive weapons will explain to users of defensive weapons that warning shots or shots to kill are two useless ways to counter a threat. The bill is not limited to “warning shots”, as usual, the media do not give reasonable information. Bad juju.
Just take all your shots on the threat if they are missing, well, that`s not unusual. You should only shoot a warning shot. The average mass is preferred when your life is in danger, I am strictly against the legalization of “warning shots”. This appears to be the first step in the pursuit of the legitimate holders of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. EACH case begins with “Why didn`t you just shoot a warning shot? Were you just looking for someone you could kill?! Imagine if warning shots were legal in the ZImmerman process. Firing diminishing shots can be extremely dangerous in most situations. It is illegal to unload your firearm within the city limits, unless there is a direct threat to your life or to those around you. This is a question that often arises; Do you shoot warning shots or shoot to kill? The legality of shooting to kill or firing warning shots in a life-or-death situation may surprise you.
Today you will hear about this instructor for defensive tactics and competitive shooters. Annie Stonebreaker and Toby Shell of Defend and Carry address an important issue of the use of defensive weapons in this episode of Gun Tips. A very, VERY BAD IDEA. If I can justify a warning shot, then I take it just to stop the attacker. I never understood the concept of a warning shot. Nor the concept of aiming for something other than the average mass. OMI, if you shoot a warning shot, you should be forced to watch a 30-minute video about ballistics and people killed by falling bullets. It`s because of this stupid woman who fired a “warning shot” at her ex-husband and she is in the pen more than 20 years ago. She earns it every 20 years.
Shooting a warning shot is the dumbest thing you can do IMO. If a group of people do something wrong to you and you shoot a warning shot, they will probably continue to chase you. Now, if you put one of these people in the chest and they see him hitting potatoes on the ground like a bag, they are likely to disperse like the cockroaches that they are. But yes, the law is pretty much a good measure to prevent this lady from going to jail. This bill corrects the strange legal situation of shooting someone who puts you less at legal risk than not shooting someone. The bill allows you, under a theory of self-defence, to justify actions with a firearm less than shooting someone.