Point (b). L. 105-298, § 102(d)(1)(B), amended title and text of subsection (b) in general. Before the amendment, the text read as follows: “The term of a copyright whose renewal period exists at any time between December 31, 1976 and December 31, 1977 inclusive, or for which the renewal of the registration is effected between December 31, 1976 and December 31, 1977 inclusive, shall be extended for a period of seventy-five years from the date of: in which copyright was initially secured. 69. The actuarial equivalency statement is a statement of an actuary who is normally the actuary. The purpose of this statement is to certify that, on the effective date of the proposed amendment, the actuarial value of the benefits immediately after the amendment of each member concerned is not less than the actuarial value of the existing benefits of that member immediately before the amendment. [35] I blink with skepticism at Ned Barlas` specter of an invalid, unenforceable, but existing (granted and “living”) patent. There may be such living things, but if so, how do they differ from invalid, unenforceable and non-existent patents? The arguments in favour of extending the term of copyright apply to both existing and future copyrights. The basic approach of the bill is to increase the current term from 56 years to 75 years if the copyright exists both in its initial term and in its renewal period. An existing right [57] in respect of a member means: the plan actuary will, for example, be involved in valuing existing benefits and assessing the impact of a proposed change on the vested benefits of affected members, providing actuarial equivalency statements if the actuarial equivalency pathway is followed, and the impact of the proposed amendments on members` benefits; and assessing the impact of any changes to the proposed changes.
Can an employee`s pension be deducted to recover stolen money from the business? When considering a reduction in an individual`s pension credits (i.e. • whether the reduction would be contrary to the anti-confiscation rule set out in section 92 of the Pensions Act 1995 (PA 1995); • whether the reduction would be contrary to the protection of existing rights of the PA 1995, § 67 • whether the reduction is permitted under the rules of the scheme • the treatment of the reduction under the tax system of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004) Each obstacle is discussed below in the context of a reduction in an employee`s pension entitlement under an occupational pension scheme; if the employee has committed a theft against the employer. Note that these questions and answers can also be used if an employee has committed another type of crime or a fraudulent or negligent act or omission that causes the employee to owe a financial obligation to the employer. Anti-forfeiture rule If an employee affiliated to an occupational pension scheme has committed a criminal, fraudulent or negligent act or omission that results in a pecuniary obligation to the employer (for example, theft of money from the employer), that employee`s pension entitlement may be reduced by All real estate and facilities leased by the company and its subsidiaries, will be subject to valid, existing and enforceable leases that the Company and its subsidiaries will respect. Here, however, it is not (only) the writer lawyers who are to blame – this is usually a function of corporate opinion politics. If the clearance certificate indicates that you are successful and your opinion says that you rely on that certificate, the idea is that you minimize your risk by reflecting the wording of the certificate in your return. (Imaginary dialogue with pollster: “It means the same thing. “We have never expressed an opinion that exists means the same thing that remains. The second category of remaining uses are findings of fact relating to intellectual property. Examples include: A member`s benefits earned at any given time are the value of the benefits to which the member is entitled, calculated as if the member`s pensionable service had ended immediately before. An adverse amendment [53] is an amendment which, if it were to come into force, would affect or could affect the existing rights of a member or survivor of a member of the scheme.